The American Comeback Tour—a 12-stop debate tour led by Charlie Kirk, a right-wing, pro-Trump conservative—kicked off at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025. The goal: gain support by publicly “owning the libs” in debate. Things began as expected, until a single gunshot to Kirk’s neck changed everything. Could it have been prevented? What went wrong? And how are people reacting?

Tyler Robinson, 22, was arrested the next day and is being held without bail in Utah County Jail. He faces charges of aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm, and obstruction of justice. His father turned him in after Robinson confessed. His first court appearance is scheduled for Tuesday, September 16 via virtual hearing.

Security Issues

The shooting took place in Utah, a red state where open carry is legal with a permit at 18+. However, Utah Valley University prohibits open carry on campus. Compared to other states, Utah’s gun laws are minimal.

Security at the event was light. Reports say there were no bag checks at the entrance, and only six university police officers were present for a crowd of about 3,000. Kirk had a private security detail, but it wasn’t enough. According to an anonymous NPR writer, “Security was pretty much nonexistent.”

Political Responses

Following the shooting, political figures across the spectrum reacted. Former President Trump was the first to break the news: “The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead…”

Former President Obama also weighed in: “We don’t yet know what motivated the shooter, but this kind of despicable violence has no place in our democracy.”

Gun Control Irony

Gun control was one of Kirk’s central talking points. He often argued that gun restrictions violate the Second Amendment. In a 2023 debate, he said, “I think it’s worth it to have a cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.”

That quote has resurfaced since his death—many calling it ironic.

Ludlow High Students React

We asked students at Ludlow High School how they felt about the incident. The majority (90.1%) said they didn’t agree with Kirk’s views. Most found out about his death through TikTok or other social media platforms, while others heard through friends or family.

Kylani Orbe said, “I felt bad for his kids but not for him or his wife. This happens to thousands of Palestinian children daily and no one bats an eye. To expect empathy for someone who supported the same violence that killed him is kind of crazy.”

Other students echoed similar thoughts—some pitied his family, but not him.

Manahil Atif added, “People are acting like he was a saint. Lots of people die every day—especially in places with war or school shootings. These same people never speak up about those deaths. Kirk didn’t care when others died, so why now?”

Could It Have Been Prevented?

There’s debate over whether stricter gun laws could’ve prevented Kirk’s death.

One student said, “Stricter laws would’ve made it harder for someone with bad intentions to get a gun in the first place.”

Others pointed to the lack of security.

Ava Whitney noted, “Anything political—especially controversial—needs serious security. Schools should have good security regardless, but this was a debate with a polarizing speaker. It should’ve been protected better.”

Free Speech Debate

We asked students whether they thought Kirk’s murder violated his right to free speech.

One student said, “No—it doesn’t violate his rights. He died because of what he believed in. He supported public access to guns, and he died by one. That’s not suppression, that’s tragic irony.”

Kylani Orbe disagreed: “Yes, it does. He had the right to speak, even if I hated what he said. But I also don’t think everyone has to mourn him. He believed empathy was weakness, and he defended gun violence. I don’t support assassination, but I also won’t pretend he was some hero.”

The Bigger Picture

Charlie Kirk’s death sparked national conversation about political violence, free speech, and gun laws. Some mourned him. Others saw his death as ironic. Still others used the moment to spotlight larger, overlooked tragedies around the world.

One thing is clear: the shooting didn’t just end a life—it opened up a nationwide debate on how we talk about speech, violence, and what we choose to care about.